**Background:** The authors challenge the conventional assumption that thermal energy from food is dissipated during digestion and does not contribute to energy balance. They propose that dietary temperature influences energy homeostasis through heat shock proteins (HSPs), especially HSP-70 and HSP-90, which possess N-terminal ATPase fragments that regulate ATP activity and hydrolysis. Obesity has been linked to increased HSP expression: serum HSP-27, HSP-60, HSP-65, HSP-70, and HSP-72 antibody levels are significantly elevated in people with obesity compared to normal-weight controls. In diet-induced obese mouse models, HSP-90 inhibitors improve glucose regulation, and HSP-90β knockdown reverses insulin resistance. The authors cite evidence that both intracellular and extracellular HSP-70 levels are significantly greater in participants with obesity than lean controls, and that the ratio of extracellular to intracellular HSP-70 may trigger chronic proinflammatory status leading to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. A prior RCT by Roumans et al (2016) found that weight regainers showed increased expression of calnexin, β-actin, HSP-27, HSP-60, and HSP-70. Another RCT in 20 young overweight men found reduced expression of HSP-90 and HSP-27 after a 3-week low-fat diet and exercise program. Animal studies in pigs show that heat stress (41.5°C) enhances adipocyte triglyceride storage through upregulation of genes involved in fatty acid uptake and triglyceride synthesis, with significantly greater cellular ATP under heat stress versus control temperature.
**Methods:** The authors propose a 4-arm randomized controlled trial with 80 healthy participants (BMI 25-35 kg/m², aged 19-65 years) randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive diets served at 37°C (thermoneutral), 42°C, 47°C, or 52°C for 12 weeks. Participants will consume boluses of soups (100 mL each) with energy content matched to individually calculated energy demands (20% breakfast, 50% lunch, 30% dinner). The day before experimental sessions, participants will avoid alcohol, caffeine, and strenuous exercise. Measurements will occur in a whole-body calorimeter at 35°C with ~20% relative humidity. Blood samples will be collected after 12-hour fasting at 0, 6, and 12 weeks. Adipose tissue biopsies and in vitro cell culture experiments will be performed. Primary outcomes include changes in BMI, body fat, body weight, waist-hip ratio, HSP levels (HSP-27, HSP-65, HSP-70, HSP-72, HSP-90) and their antibodies, and metabolic markers (motilin, fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, 2-hour glucose, HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes include total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and NF-κB. A crossover design with 2-week washout periods is also proposed. Sample size calculations are based on the R value (eHSP-70 to iHSP-70 ratio), with 80 participants needed (20 per arm) to achieve adequate power.
**Clinical Implications:** If dietary temperature proves to influence energy balance through HSP-mediated mechanisms, this would have profound implications for metabolic research. Future clinical trials would need to control for dietary temperature when analyzing data. Published metabolic studies may need to be revisited. Dietary recommendations for daily energy intake across age groups and disease states would require adjustment. Cross-cultural comparisons of dietary patterns and obesity rates would need to account for differences in customary food and beverage temperatures. The authors also suggest that dietary temperature may confound the relationship between self-reported energy intake and actual energy balance, potentially explaining discrepancies in studies using dietary assessment tools.