**Background:** Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common neoplasm worldwide, with 2.3 million new cases in 2020 and an expected rise to over 3 million cases by 2040. Current treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy) have significant side effects that impact quality of life and treatment adherence. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs), particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have shown preclinical promise as supportive therapeutic agents by reducing inflammation, modulating cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and inhibiting angiogenesis. This systematic review evaluated the last 5 years of preclinical evidence on ω-3 PUFAs for BC prevention and treatment.
**Methods:** A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for articles published between June 2017 and September 2022, following PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy used Boolean operators with keywords for omega-3 fatty acids and breast cancer, excluding clinical trials, meta-analyses, reviews, and non-English publications. Inclusion criteria required original full-text articles using animal models of BC (transgenic, tumor cell induction, or chemical induction) to evaluate dietary ω-3 PUFA enrichment for prevention or treatment, with or without antitumor drugs. Eleven authors independently screened titles/abstracts, and five authors selected final articles. Data were extracted on experimental design, diet characteristics, tumor induction methods, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed by paired review with third-author adjudication.
**Results:** From 679 initial records (216 PubMed, 463 Scopus), 27 studies met inclusion criteria. The most common BC induction model was tumor cell transplantation (69%), followed by transgenic models (17%) and chemical induction (14%). Murine models were used in 93% of studies (primarily Balb/c mice, 57%) and rats in 7%. Triple-negative BC (TNBC) cells were used in 80% of cell-transplant studies, predominantly MDA-MB-231 cells (35%). Dietary ω-3 PUFA sources included fish oil (29.6%), menhaden oil (11.1%), chia oil (7.4%), flaxseed oil (7.4%), and DHAsco (14.8%). The three most used ω-3 types were ALA, DHA (each 63%), and EPA (44.4%). Combined ω-3 PUFA plus antitumor drug treatment was evaluated in 55.6% of studies. Key outcomes: combined treatment achieved the highest early tumor growth reduction (mean 77%, maximum 87% within 15 days) and tumor weight reduction (mean 57%, maximum 86%). ω-3 PUFA-enriched diet alone (higher ω-3 than ω-6) showed a mean tumor incidence delay of 20% at 50% animal-affection and 12% at 100% affection. Tumor latency (T50) showed a mean delay of 19 days (range 7–50 days). Metastasis reduction was 70% with combined treatment (range 61–84%) versus 37% with ω-3 PUFA alone (range 14–70%). Survival increased by a mean of 23 days (range 5–45 days) with combined treatment and 20 days with ω-3 PUFA alone. Molecular analyses focused on proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation, angiogenesis (VEGF), and immune checkpoint pathways.
**Clinical Implications:** This systematic review provides preclinical evidence that ω-3 PUFA supplementation, especially combined with conventional chemotherapy, enhances antitumor efficacy by reducing tumor burden, delaying progression, and improving survival in BC models. The benefits were most pronounced in TNBC models, which are clinically the most aggressive subtype with limited targeted therapy options. The findings support the potential of ω-3 PUFAs as a safe, accessible adjunct to standard BC treatment, potentially reducing chemotherapy side effects and improving outcomes. However, significant heterogeneity in experimental designs, ω-3 doses, and outcome measures precludes determination of an optimal therapeutic dose. The authors note that clinical studies have shown ω-3 PUFA supplementation reduces Ki-67 and VEGF expression in BC patients. Future research should focus on standardizing ω-3 dosing regimens and evaluating long-term effects in well-designed clinical trials.