**Background:** Adherence to a healthy diet reduces risk of non-communicable diseases, yet barriers include cost, time, stress, and lack of cooking skills. Home cooking is emerging as a strategy to improve dietary adherence, but there is no consensus on learning objectives for culinary medicine programs. The transtheoretical model describes stages of change (precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance) that may inform personalized interventions. This study aimed to explore participant goals when enrolling in a home cooking intervention and examine whether those in different stages of change (contemplation vs. action) have different needs and expectations.
**Methods:** This was a bi-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03823469) conducted at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (Boston, MA) and Sheba Medical Center (Tel Aviv, Israel). Inclusion criteria: BMI 27.5–35 kg/m², primary food provider consuming fewer than 5 home-cooked lunches/dinners per week, age 25–70. At baseline, participants completed the validated URICA (University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale) to assess stage of change regarding home cooking, and an open-ended questionnaire about goals, expectations, concerns, and challenges. Participants were categorized as contemplation (URICA < 11) or action (URICA > 11). Conventional content analysis was performed manually on each group separately, using triangulation (multiple researchers: AF, RP, MF, MB) to enhance trustworthiness. Demographics were analyzed using t-tests and chi-squared tests.
**Key Results:** All 75 participants completed questionnaires (39 from Sheba, 36 from Spaulding). Sixteen (21%) were in the action stage and 59 (79%) in the contemplation stage. Both groups were similar in gender, age, ethnic background, employment, income, and education. Contemplation stage participants expressed expectations to: (1) acquire culinary knowledge and skills (e.g., 'learn how to cook healthier and more nutritious food'), (2) improve self-regulatory skills (prioritizing, planning, time management), (3) adopt sustainable change, (4) achieve healthy eating and lifestyle goals (weight loss, health improvement), and (5) get guidance and support from experts. Their concerns included pre-existing culinary challenges, insufficient self-regulation abilities, implementation in daily routine (cost, time, lack of family support), and overcoming obstacles for sustainability (fear of failure, past negative experiences). Action stage participants expressed expectations to: (1) expand existing culinary knowledge and techniques (e.g., 'learn how to cook for just 1–2 people'), (2) adopt sustainable change with emphasis on fun and enjoyment, (3) achieve healthy eating and lifestyle goals, and (4) change habits and lifestyle overall. Their main concerns were continuity and sustainability of healthy changes (e.g., 'being consistent', 'not get sabotaged by friends and family').
**Clinical Implications:** Current home cooking education focuses primarily on culinary skills. This study suggests that a patient-centered, personalized approach should consider participants' stage of change. For contemplation-stage participants, interventions should include foundational culinary and self-regulatory skills, guidance, support, and addressing concerns about failure. For action-stage participants, interventions should focus on enhancing existing confidence and skills, honing techniques, and strengthening internal motivations for sustainability. Matching cognitive processes of change (e.g., consciousness-raising for contemplation; stimulus control and contingency management for action) may improve outcomes. Limitations include a small number of action-stage participants (n=16) and lack of social diversity. Further research is needed to determine whether stage-based personalized home cooking interventions yield sustainable improvements in dietary habits.