**Background:** Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary retinal degenerative disease with progressive photoreceptor loss, affecting about 1 in 4000 people. Oxidative stress is considered a key factor in RP pathogenesis. Molecular hydrogen (H₂) is a selective antioxidant with anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties. Hydrogen-rich water (HRW) is a safe, convenient form of H₂ delivery. Previous animal studies showed HRW protected retinal morphology and function in RP models, but clinical evidence in humans was lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of HRW in RP patients.
**Methods:** Thirteen patients (3 males, 10 females; mean age 50.54 ± 10.26 years; 24 eyes) with clinically diagnosed RP were enrolled between July and September 2019. Inclusion criteria included progressive night blindness, decreased visual field, fundus characteristics, abnormal ERG, age ≤65 years, BCVA ≥20/2000, and no other ocular or systemic diseases. Patients drank 400–500 ml of HRW (H₂ concentration 1.6 mg/L) twice daily for four consecutive weeks. Before and after the intervention, the following were measured: BCVA (decimal chart), IOP (non-contact tonometer), retinal and choroidal thickness (Spectralis OCT, manual measurement at fovea and 500 μm intervals nasally and temporally), full-field ERG (dark-adapted 0.01, 3.0, OPs; light-adapted 3.0 and 30 Hz flicker) and VEP (PVEP for eyes with BCVA >20/200, FVEP for eyes with BCVA <20/200). Statistical analysis used paired t-tests (SPSS 26.0).
**Key Results:** After HRW drinking, mean BCVA improved from 0.33 ± 0.26 to 0.34 ± 0.25 (t = -2.954, P = 0.007). IOP did not change significantly (14.04 ± 2.12 vs. 13.71 ± 1.92 mmHg, P = 0.276). Retinal thickness (143.54 ± 55.89 vs. 144.79 ± 55.29 μm, P = 0.256) and choroidal thickness (188.88 ± 79.09 vs. 187.67 ± 74.42 μm, P = 0.571) were not significantly different. ERG showed statistically significant improvements in several parameters: Dark-adapted 0.01 b-wave amplitude (42.83 ± 31.20 vs. 43.63 ± 31.55 μV, P = 0.020); Dark-adapted 3.0 a-wave amplitude (110.19 ± 121.42 vs. 112.75 ± 122.92 μV, P = 0.010) and peak time (19.18 ± 6.05 vs. 16.86 ± 5.59 ms, P = 0.010); Dark-adapted 3.0 b-wave amplitude (106.25 ± 74.79 vs. 110.81 ± 76.93 μV, P = 0.010) and peak time (45.75 ± 5.75 vs. 45.27 ± 5.85 ms, P = 0.010); Dark-adapted OPs total amplitude (184.53 ± 74.97 vs. 186.07 ± 75.28 μV, P = 0.010) and O₂ peak time (43.01 ± 9.47 vs. 39.34 ± 9.93 ms, P = 0.010); Light-adapted 3.0 a-wave amplitude (29.44 ± 29.56 vs. 32.32 ± 29.12 μV, P = 0.010) and peak time (20.62 ± 8.04 vs. 18.86 ± 7.37 ms, P = 0.010); Light-adapted 3.0 b-wave amplitude (63.75 ± 50.02 vs. 65.35 ± 50.05 μV, P = 0.010) and peak time (39.76 ± 14.63 vs. 37.47 ± 14.48 ms, P = 0.010); Light-adapted 30 Hz flicker amplitude (61.40 ± 55.93 vs. 62.80 ± 55.87 μV, P = 0.001). For VEP, in the 6 patients (11 eyes) with BCVA >20/200, only the 15′ PVEP P100 peak time showed a statistically significant change (132.78 ± 14.69 vs. 132.49 ± 14.62 ms, P = 0.018); other PVEP parameters and all FVEP parameters in the 7 patients (13 eyes) with BCVA <20/200 were not significantly different.
**Clinical Implications:** This preliminary study suggests that short-term HRW consumption may slightly improve visual function (BCVA and some ERG parameters) in RP patients without adversely affecting IOP or retinal/choroidal structure. The improvements were modest and mainly in cone-system ERG responses, possibly because rod function was already severely compromised. The lack of change in VEP parameters indicates no significant effect on the overall visual pathway. The study is limited by small sample size, short duration, lack of a control group, and no dietary assessment. These findings support the need for larger, longer, controlled trials to validate HRW as a potential adjunctive therapy for RP. The safety and feasibility of HRW are reinforced, but its clinical benefit remains uncertain.