**Background:** Dry eye syndromes (DES) are common in presbyopic adults, and contact lens wear can exacerbate ocular surface issues. Large-diameter multifocal contact lenses (soft and rigid) are used to correct presbyopia, but their impact on the ocular surface, tear film, and visual quality in patients with DES is not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different large-diameter multifocal contact lenses on these parameters in presbyopic adults with DES.
**Methods:** A mixed two-factor design (3 groups × 4 measurements) experimental study was conducted from November 2020 to May 2021 at Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan. 42 presbyopic adults (mean age 46.24 ± 3.88 years; 12 men, 30 women) with DES (OSDI ≥ 13, DEQ-5 > 6 and < 12) were randomly assigned to three groups: Proclear (soft, near-center design, n=12), SMR (soft, distance-center design, n=12), and Optimum (rigid gas-permeable, distance-center design, n=18). Participants wore lenses 6–8 hours/day for 2 weeks. Measurements were taken at baseline (wearing spectacles), day 1, week 1, and week 2. Ocular surface (corneal fluorescence staining, conjunctival/limbal redness using Efron Grading Scales and Oxford scale), tear quality (non-invasive tear break-up time [NI-TBUT], lipid layer thickness, contact TBUT), visual quality (blink frequency, modulation transfer function [MTF] total area and high-order aberration ratio, OSDI and VBP questionnaires), and visual function (near visual acuity, stereopsis, near point of accommodation) were assessed. Statistical analysis used two-way ANOVA with repeated measures and simple main effects.
**Key Results:** Ocular surface: Corneal fluorescence staining (F=7.235, p=0.001) and limbal redness (F=3.443, p=0.042) worsened over time, especially with Optimum (corneal: F=4.489, p=0.007; limbal: F=3.357, p=0.026), but values remained within normal range. Conjunctival redness showed no significant difference between groups. Tear quality (lens-on): NI-TBUT decreased significantly for all lenses (Proclear: F=6.177, p=0.002; SMR: F=17.132, p<0.001; Optimum: F=4.807, p=0.005). Lipid layer thickness decreased for Proclear (F=7.118, p=0.001) and SMR (F=3.778, p=0.020) but not for Optimum (F=0.291, p=0.832). Tear quality (lens-off): NI-TBUT remained worse for SMR (F=11.786, p<0.001). Lipid layer thickness improved for SMR (F=8.423, p<0.001) and Optimum (F=7.043, p<0.001). Contact TBUT improved for Optimum (F=4.860, p=0.005). Visual quality: Blink frequency (lens-on) showed no significant change (F=1.088, p=0.357); lens-off blink frequency increased for Optimum (F=7.729, p<0.001). MTF total area ratio improved significantly for all lenses (Proclear: F=71.318, p<0.001; SMR: F=13.752, p<0.001; Optimum: F=20.766, p<0.001). MTF high-order aberration ratio worsened for all lenses (Proclear: F=13.440, p<0.001; SMR: F=19.702, p<0.001; Optimum: F=20.211, p<0.001). OSDI scores improved for SMR (F=8.117, p=0.002) and Optimum (F=3.567, p=0.041). VBP scores improved for Optimum (F=3.132, p=0.047). Visual function: Near visual acuity improved for Optimum (F=3.847, p=0.015). Stereopsis showed no significant difference. Near point of accommodation worsened for Proclear (right: F=12.255, p<0.001; left: F=13.436, p<0.001) but not for SMR or Optimum.
**Clinical Implications:** Large-diameter multifocal contact lenses can be used in presbyopic adults with dry eye syndromes, but clinicians should monitor ocular surface changes, especially with rigid lenses. Distance-center designs (SMR and Optimum) may offer better subjective comfort and visual function, particularly for near vision and accommodation. The improvement in MTF total area ratio suggests enhanced visual quality despite increased high-order aberrations. Proper lens fitting and patient education are essential to minimize negative impacts on the tear film. Longer-term studies are needed to assess sustained effects.