A scoping review of retail environment interventions and their impacts on health and wellbeing

The European Journal of Public Health · 5 authors, 5 centres

AI SUMMARY

FIDELITY 100%

This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.

AGENT 01 · STRUCTURED SUMMARY

TRACE TO SOURCE

“

TL;DR

This scoping review mapped evidence from 53 peer-reviewed studies and 10 grey literature reports on retail environment interventions and their health and wellbeing impacts. Evidence for intervention effectiveness was mixed, and most literature focused on social and environmental outcomes rather than direct health outcomes.

Full summary

497 CHARS

Intervention types included area-based initiatives, business improvement districts, business incentives, and demand-side incentives. Evidence for intervention effectiveness was mixed depending on intervention type. Theories of change underpinning interventions were found to be reductionist and often did not account for context-specific factors. The review highlights that most existing literature evaluates social and environmental outcomes rather than more direct health and wellbeing outcomes.

STUDY TYPE

systematic_review

SPECIALTY

public health

SUMMARISED BY

AI pipeline

FIDELITY CHECK

100% · A

ORIGINAL PAPER

PMC10595337

A scoping review of retail environment interventions and their impacts on health and wellbeing

The European Journal of Public Health

READ THE FULL PAPER

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background ‘High streets’ and town centres are influential in shaping health. In recent years many countries implemented policies to revitalise and financially support retail environments. The aim of this scoping review is to systematically map evidence on retail environment interventions, to gain an understanding of their possible health and wellbeing impacts. This review identifies types of interventions, the health outcomes they address and the associated theories of change. Methods Peer-reviewed studies in English were identified through five academic databases using search terms for relevant initiatives and health and wellbeing outcomes. Grey literature was identified online and through citation scanning. Studies were eligible if they evaluated interventions with a significant focus on supporting the retail environment, reporting on at least one health and wellbeing outcome. Extracted data were presented descriptively. Theories of change were analysed using an interpretive approach. Results Of 6,752 identified evaluations, 53 peer-reviewed studies and 10 grey literature reports were included. Interventions types were area-based initiatives, business improvement districts, business incentives, and demand-side incentives. The most common outcomes were social and environmental determinants of health, although impacts on physical health, mental health, and food consumption and purchasing were also studied. Most interventions involved partnerships with the private sector or were ‘whole-of-society’ initiatives. Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions was mixed, depending on the type of intervention. Theories of change were found to be reductionist and often did not account for context-specific factors. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first review of literature evaluating the health impacts of interventions aimed at revitalising retail environments. Future interventions should more comprehensively address economic, health and social outcomes. Key messages • High street environments are influential in shaping health, and initiatives aimed at supporting local businesses should consider health and social objectives. • Most literature to date evaluates social and environmental outcomes of retail environment interventions rather than more direct health and wellbeing outcomes.

CITATION EXPORT

C Rinaldi, E McGill, M Petticrew et al.. A scoping review of retail environment interventions and their impacts on health and wellbeing. The European Journal of Public Health. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1657

AUTHORS

5 · 5 CENTRES

C Rinaldi, E McGill, M Petticrew, C Knai, M Egan

Public Health, Environments and Society, LSHTM, London, UK
Public Health, Environments and Society, LSHTM, London, UK
Public Health, Environments and Society, LSHTM, London, UK
Health Services Research and Policy, LSHTM, London, UK
Public Health, Environments and Society, LSHTM, London, UK