A-trait and risk-taking behavior in predicting injury severity among martial arts athletes

Frontiers in Psychology · 7 authors, 6 centres

AI SUMMARY

FIDELITY 100%

This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.

AGENT 01 · STRUCTURED SUMMARY

TRACE TO SOURCE

“

TL;DR

Researchers used validated questionnaires to assess anxiety in physically dangerous conditions and new situations, along with instrumental and stimulating risk-taking.

Full summary

531 CHARS

Researchers used validated questionnaires to assess anxiety in physically dangerous conditions and new situations, along with instrumental and stimulating risk-taking. Statistical analyses included MANOVA, t-tests, and logistic regression. Key findings indicate that a higher level of instrumental risk and a moderate or slightly below average anxiety in new situations were linked to a decreased likelihood of severe injuries. The study found no significant association between the level of sports performance and injury severity.

STUDY TYPE

other

SPECIALTY

preclinical research

SUMMARISED BY

AI pipeline

FIDELITY CHECK

100% · A

ORIGINAL PAPER

PMC10352455

A-trait and risk-taking behavior in predicting injury severity among martial arts athletes

Frontiers in Psychology

READ THE FULL PAPER

ABSTRACT

Introduction Trait anxiety (A-trait) can be seen as a multiplicative function of the person–situation interaction. Considering risk-taking behavior (R-TB), literature highlights instrumental and stimulating risk. The aim of the research is to investigate the level of A-trait (in physically dangerous conditions and in new, unusual situations) and the level of R-TB (instrumental and stimulating risk) in athletes, and to verify to what extent A-trait and risk-taking behavior predict injury severity. Materials and methods One hundred and fifty-four senior martial arts athletes from grappling combat sports, striking combat sports and mixed martial artists (MMA) participated in the study. For assessing trait anxiety and risk-taking behavior, the Romanian adaptation of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales (EMAS), respectively the Romanian adaptation of the Makarowski’s Stimulating and Instrumental Risk Questionnaire were used. Results Using multivariate analysis of variance, significant differences between athletes (according to the sports disciplines practiced), in terms of A-trait and R-TB, were examined. Next, we checked the existing correlations between injury severity, A-trait and R-TB scores in athletes practicing striking combat sports, grappling combat sports and MMA. To verify whether there are significant differences in terms of trait anxiety, stimulating and instrumental risk between athletes who have suffered mild, moderate and/or severe injuries and athletes who have suffered only minor/mild injuries, t-Test for Independent Samples was used. Binomial logistic regression procedures were, also, performed, predicting athletes’ likelihood of injury, based on R-TB and A-trait. Conclusion A moderate or slightly below average level of anxiety in new, unusual situations and a higher level of instrumental risk are linked with a decreased likelihood of severe injuries in athletes. Martial arts athletes (in entire sample) who have suffered more severe injuries are more adrenaline-seeking in competition and use less rational thinking, taking more pleasure in just performing technical executions, regardless of the outcome.

CITATION EXPORT

Ionuț Patenteu, Radu Predoiu, Ryszard Makarowski et al.. A-trait and risk-taking behavior in predicting injury severity among martial arts athletes. Frontiers in Psychology. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134829

AUTHORS

7 · 6 CENTRES

Ionuț Patenteu, Radu Predoiu, Ryszard Makarowski, Alexandra Predoiu, Andrzej Piotrowski, Adina Geambașu, Sarah Adriana Nica

1Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania
2Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Teachers’ Training Department, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania
3Faculty of Administration and Social Sciences, Academy of Applied Medical and Social Sciences in Elblag, Elblag, Poland
4Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Sports and Motor Performance Department, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania
5Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
6Faculty of Physiotherapy, Special Motricity and Medical Recovery Department, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania