Preoperative demographics, aetiology, and spinopelvic parameters were comparable between cohorts.
Brain & Spine · 6 authors, 4 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
Preoperative demographics, aetiology, and spinopelvic parameters were comparable between cohorts.
Preoperative demographics, aetiology, and spinopelvic parameters were comparable between cohorts. At minimum 2-year follow-up, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS back/leg pain scores, COMI scores, and all measured spinopelvic radiological parameters compared to baseline. No significant differences were found between OLIF and LLIF for clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, or complication rates. Pseudoarthrosis rate was 5%, lower than published posterior-only technique rates. No iliopsoas or quadriceps weakness was reported in either cohort. Overall complication rate was 72.5% (major 45%, minor 32.5%), though the authors attributed this to prospective collection, inclusion of blood loss exceeding 2000 ml as major, and severe baseline disease.