Both treatments significantly improved key outcomes, and BMA was found to have equivalent efficacy and safety to IDA.
Medicine · 2 authors, 1 centre
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
Both treatments significantly improved key outcomes, and BMA was found to have equivalent efficacy and safety to IDA.
The primary outcome was the OSDI score, with secondary outcomes being VAS, QoL, and Schirmer I test scores. Both treatments produced statistically significant improvements in all four outcome measures from baseline. A significant difference was noted for tear production in the left eye. No adverse events were reported, supporting safety. The study suggests BMA is a safe and effective alternative to IDA, particularly for patients with metal allergies.