The resulting 15-variable index demonstrated strong reliability and validity for measuring area-level deprivation in a low-resource setting.
PLOS ONE · 11 authors, 5 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
The resulting 15-variable index demonstrated strong reliability and validity for measuring area-level deprivation in a low-resource setting.
A final 15-variable unidimensional model had the best fit (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93). The standardized ADI scores ranged from 58.0 to 140.0, with higher scores indicating greater deprivation. The index showed strong criterion validity (Pearson’s correlation with Multi-dimensional Poverty Index = 0.77) and good construct validity (Comparative Fit Index = 0.96). The factor structure was consistent across administrative regions. Limitations include the exclusion of variables like income and road type, and the index's development specifically for the Nepalese context may limit its generalizability.