Early feeding problems were common but rarely predicted ARFID, whereas broader neurodevelopmental problems were more predictive.
JCPP Advances · 10 authors, 9 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
Early feeding problems were common but rarely predicted ARFID, whereas broader neurodevelopmental problems were more predictive.
This prospective birth cohort study used data from a sub-sample of the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS) to examine whether early neurodevelopmental problems (NDPs) predict suspected ARFID in 4–7-year-old children. ARFID was identified cross-sectionally at age 4–7 years using a newly developed screening tool. Children in the highest risk decile of the composite NDP risk score had an absolute ARFID risk of 3.1% compared to 1.1% below that threshold, representing roughly three times higher odds. Early NDPs excluding feeding problems were more predictive of later ARFID than early feeding problems, though the total explained variance was small at 3.2%. Specific predictive NDPs included problems with general development, communication/language, attention/concentration, social interaction, and sleep. Neurodevelopmental trajectories diverged after age 1 year. Key limitations include reliance on a newly developed, not yet fully validated screening tool for ARFID, a small ARFID subsample limiting statistical power, parent-report-only data on NDPs, and a 56.6% response rate with potential healthier-responder bias.