A qualitative realist evaluation assessed how health care workers in 12 Kenyan immunization clinics integrated an electronic immunization registry into their workflows through semistructured interviews and workflow observations.
JMIR Formative Research · 10 authors, 8 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
A qualitative realist evaluation assessed how health care workers in 12 Kenyan immunization clinics integrated an electronic immunization registry into their workflows through semistructured interviews and workflow observations.
Researchers conducted semistructured interviews with 19 health care workers and observed 58 immunization clinic workflow sessions. The electronic immunization registry was generally well accepted by users; however, barriers included software bugs that incorrectly displayed key fields, poor network connectivity preventing syncing, and contextual pressures from insufficient staff and high patient load. Limitations include limited generalizability from purposive sampling and potential Hawthorne and social desirability biases.