This qualitative study used focus group discussions with South African participants to explore how different dimensions and manifestations of microaggression impact wellbeing.
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · 7 authors, 4 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
This qualitative study used focus group discussions with South African participants to explore how different dimensions and manifestations of microaggression impact wellbeing.
The study employed a phenomenological qualitative approach using focus group discussions (FGDs) with South African participants across multiple racial groups. The findings confirmed that microaggression, particularly invalidation and systemic forms, negatively impacts wellbeing, especially emotional wellbeing, psychological health, and socioeconomic status. The impact was shaped by historical and social context, such as apartheid. Limitations included the subjective nature of experiences, challenges in generalising from the phenomenological approach, and potential bias from providing situational examples. The implications suggest that addressing microaggression is vital for improving welfare in multi-group settings.