This narrative review proposes that reciprocal interactions among the redoxome, bioenergetics, and temperature signaling drive the differential physiology of sleep and wakefulness.
Antioxidants · 2 authors, 3 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
This narrative review proposes that reciprocal interactions among the redoxome, bioenergetics, and temperature signaling drive the differential physiology of sleep and wakefulness.
This paper presents a hypothesis-driven narrative review synthesizing published human and animal studies on circadian regulation of mitochondrial function and sleep-wake cycling. The authors propose the "redox–bioenergetics–temperature and differential mitochondrial–nuclear regulatory hypothesis," arguing that reversible cysteine oxoform modifications—including S-glutathionylation and S-nitrosylation—regulate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, protein activity, respiration, and metabolomics across the circadian cycle. A central finding is that nuclear DNA repair and cellular protein synthesis are maximized during wakefulness, while redoxome restoration and mitochondrial remodeling are maximized during sleep, yielding the distinction of nucleorestorative wakefulness and mitorestorative sleep. The authors contend that spatiotemporal fluctuations in the mitochondrial interactome, including quantitative variation of ROS, GSH, GSSG, uncoupling proteins, and complex II, underpin these differential states. Limitations include reliance on previously published data without new experiments, species and tissue variability, and acknowledged inability of any single hypothesis to comprehensively describe sleep-wake cycling complexities.