“
TL;DR
It found that the literature base is very limited, with both tools not being widely used or rigorously evaluated in the Indian population.
Pediatric Reports · 3 authors, 1 centre
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
It found that the literature base is very limited, with both tools not being widely used or rigorously evaluated in the Indian population.
The authors conducted a comprehensive search and evaluated the quality of studies identified. The key finding is that India lacks a substantial literature base on the use of these screening tools. The review identified that empirical research on the PEDS in India is scarce, and while the SDQ has been used more frequently, most studies lacked transparency in translation processes and often did not consider teacher evaluations. A major limitation noted is the paucity of studies, and the need for further research to validate translated versions of these tools and establish appropriate cut-off values for the Indian population. The review concludes that there is a significant gap in local literature and practice, highlighting the need for more research to ensure these screening tools are relevant and applicable.