The authors screened German-language phytotherapy literature to identify plants most commonly recommended for oral discomfort and developed an anamnesis tool assessing knowledge and usage of 16 plants.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · 4 authors, 3 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
The authors screened German-language phytotherapy literature to identify plants most commonly recommended for oral discomfort and developed an anamnesis tool assessing knowledge and usage of 16 plants.
The authors screened German-language phytotherapy literature to identify plants most commonly recommended for oral discomfort and developed an anamnesis tool assessing knowledge and usage of 16 plants. A total of 120 head-neck cancer patients at a collaborating outpatient clinic and 168 medical students via an online survey were questioned in 2020. Students were additionally asked to record indications for plants used in daily life. Primary component analysis, heat-map analysis, network analysis, and VENN diagrams were used to visualize and compare knowledge and behavior. Students used significantly more plants in daily life than patients (p < 0.001), though both groups demonstrated similar knowledge and shared the same top five most commonly known plants. Network analysis revealed that students associated certain plants with corresponding symptom clusters. The study is limited by potential underestimation of plant knowledge due to regional naming differences, restriction to German-language sources, and a non-representative, single-center patient cohort. The authors note that their patient sample may overestimate general phytotherapy use in cancer patients compared to published rates.