“
TL;DR
The process involved focus group interviews and a mock test with stakeholders, who were older volunteers (FC supporters).
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 11 authors, 8 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
The process involved focus group interviews and a mock test with stakeholders, who were older volunteers (FC supporters).
The process involved focus group interviews and a mock test with stakeholders, who were older volunteers (FC supporters). The results reported include a marginally high System Usability Scale score (70.2 ± 10.3), indicating acceptable usability, and a finding that the reliability of the onsite FC program was significantly associated with these usability scores. The study also noted improvements in the self-efficacy of the FC supporters after the mock test. Limitations include a primary focus on development and preliminary evaluation rather than efficacy testing, potential recruitment bias, and limited generalizability to non-Japanese populations. Implications suggest the online application could be a useful tool for frailty monitoring, especially in a hybrid onsite-online model.