“
TL;DR
Feedback from students and lecturers indicated the tool was helpful for understanding and interlinking content, and its open template allows educators to customize it for other subjects.
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health · 10 authors, 16 centres
This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.
Feedback from students and lecturers indicated the tool was helpful for understanding and interlinking content, and its open template allows educators to customize it for other subjects.
The tool was created using free software and tested via questionnaires with students and lecturers. Survey results showed that students found the content understandable and the tool helpful for their studies, while lecturers appreciated its potential for adaptation to other topics. Feedback led to improvements in user-friendliness and graphical details. The authors note limitations such as potential response bias and the tool's asynchronous nature, which limits direct peer interaction. The tool aligns with open education initiatives and Bloom's taxonomy, offering a template for educators to create their own versions for various educational topics.