What matters to program partners when implementing a community-based exercise program for people post-stroke? A theory-based qualitative study and cost analysis

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · 10 authors, 8 centres

AI SUMMARY

FIDELITY 100%

This summary was generated by AI from a single paper. It has not been reviewed by a clinician and is not clinical advice. Verify against the source before acting on it.

AGENT 01 · STRUCTURED SUMMARY

TRACE TO SOURCE

“

TL;DR

Full summary

437 CHARS

This descriptive qualitative study was embedded within a pilot randomized controlled trial to explore stakeholders' experiences with implementing a 12-week, task-oriented community-based exercise program for people post-stroke. The study also reported personnel and transportation cost estimates for first-time implementation. The findings provide stakeholder-driven recommendations and cost data to inform future program implementation.

STUDY TYPE

other

SPECIALTY

neurology

SUMMARISED BY

AI pipeline

FIDELITY CHECK

100% · A

ORIGINAL PAPER

PMC10461472

What matters to program partners when implementing a community-based exercise program for people post-stroke? A theory-based qualitative study and cost analysis

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences

READ THE FULL PAPER

ABSTRACT

Background Community-based exercise programs integrating a healthcare-community partnership (CBEP-HCP) can facilitate lifelong exercise participation for people post-stroke. Understanding the process of implementation from multiple perspectives can inform strategies to promote program sustainability. Purpose To explore stakeholders' experiences with undertaking first-time implementation of a group, task-oriented CBEP-HCP for people post-stroke and describe associated personnel and travel costs. Methods We conducted a descriptive qualitative study within a pilot randomized controlled trial. In three cities, trained fitness instructors delivered a 12-week CBEP-HCP targeting balance and mobility limitations to people post-stroke at a recreation centre with support from a healthcare partner. Healthcare and recreation managers and personnel at each site participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups by telephone post-intervention. Interviews and data analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research and Theoretical Domains Framework, for managers and program providers, respectively. We estimated personnel and travel costs associated with implementing the program. Results Twenty individuals from three sites (4 recreation and 3 healthcare managers, 7 fitness instructors, 3 healthcare partners, and 3 volunteers) participated. We identified two themes related to the decision to partner and implement the program: (1) Program quality and packaging, and cost-benefit comparisons influenced managers' decisions to partner and implement the CBEP-HCP, and (2) Previous experiences and beliefs about program benefits influenced staff decisions to become instructors. We identified two additional themes related to experiences with training and program delivery: (1) Program staff with previous experience and training faced initial role-based challenges that resolved with program delivery, and (2) Organizational capacity to manage program resource requirements influenced managers' decisions to continue the program. Participants identified recommendations related to partnership formation, staff/volunteer selection, training, and delivery of program activities. Costs (in CAD) for first-time program implementation were: healthcare partner ($680); fitness coordinators and instructors ($3,153); and participant transportation (personal vehicle: $283; public transit: $110). Conclusion During first-time implementation of a CBEP-HCP, healthcare and hospital managers focused on cost, resource requirements, and the added-value of the program, while instructors and healthcare partners focused on their preparedness for the role and their ability to manage individuals with balance and mobility limitations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03122626 . Registered April 17, 2017—Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03122626

CITATION EXPORT

Gayatri Aravind, Kainat Bashir, Jill I. Cameron et al.. What matters to program partners when implementing a community-based exercise program for people post-stroke? A theory-based qualitative study and cost analysis. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1064206

AUTHORS

10 · 8 CENTRES

Gayatri Aravind, Kainat Bashir, Jill I. Cameron, Mark T. Bayley, Robert W. Teasell, Jo-Anne Howe, Alda Tee, Susan B. Jaglal, Susan Hunter, Nancy M. Salbach

1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Community Programs and After Stroke, March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
6Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, St. Joseph’s Healthcare London—Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
7Central East Stroke Network, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
8School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

Gayatri Aravind, Kainat Bashir, Jill I. Cameron et al.. What matters to program partners when implementing a community-based exercise program for people post-stroke? A theory-based qualitative study and cost analysis. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1064206